Great Sage
Banned deucer.
No. A fetus in utero leeches nutrients from the mother automatically, while a newborn can only leech nutrients if the mother allows it to breastfeed.fixed :)
No. A fetus in utero leeches nutrients from the mother automatically, while a newborn can only leech nutrients if the mother allows it to breastfeed.fixed :)
FREEDOM IS SLAVERYA FETUS IN UTERO IS NOT A BABY
THANKS FOR YOUR TIME
I think it's official. You're the woman of my dreams.And, DM, that sounds nothing short of wonderful; but please, when we go to bed at night let me serve you a nightcap of the finest bourbon with a side order of fellatio?
http://img120.imageshack.us/img120/5952/maorulezwk5.gifBetween the Great Leap Forward, (up to 43 million dead from famine), the Cultural Revolution (essentially purging China of intellectual talent and destroying its cultural heritage), widespread cannibalism, widespread political persecution, I'd say that's a big improvement in living standards (especially when you consider that Republican China was fairly awful too, at least until they took over Taiwan.)
Capitalism is built on death and exploitation sorry. If you call increases in life expectancy and literacy 'failing', while at the same time calling The Scramble for Africa and China blocking aid to Darfur because PetroChina has a nice oil deal with the Sudanese 'wroking' ... then okay. No socialist society has been as much as it could be so far in our history(perhaps a bit because Capitalist nations try to destroy them because they want to go back to exploiting their natural resources) but they have caused much less death and destruction than Capitalism has. If you think Capitalism works because living standards for some classes in the home country improves, you are not looking at the whole picture.I am not going to assume you're a total idiot, so I'm going to assume that you lied because you're fucking obsessed with a failed system that has been a failure everywhere it's been tried, so you gloss over historical facts and blame "capitalists" for everything, while at the same time constantly making excuses for why socialism failed so hard everywhere its been tried, where free-market capitalism (which is not really what we have now, it's more like a cross betweeen free-market capitalism and corporate mercantilism) has been successful almost everywhere. (and if you say "any country in Africa" I will mention that most African countries were more or less socialist for most of their history).
this statement seems highly irreleventI mean seriously - in big bad USA a family at the poverty line probably has as much buying power as the family making median income in China, and they kick the shit out of a median-income family in Cuba or North Korea. But oh right "capitalist exploitation" - it's like a magic word that explains everything - just say "capitalist exploitation" and it ends the argument for a socialist.
yeah, you have to make your OWN money in capitalist countries! thats why economic mobility in them is so good am i right lolWhatever though, keep on believing that we can steal money from people and violate basic economic principles - when you actually have to make your own money, or at least understand the basic workings of making your own money, you might see things differently.
um but you conveniently forgot to show the pre-Communist China birth/death rates lol, also remember that the pre-Communist guys are the same people running Taiwan, and they're doing prettty well amiritehttp://img120.imageshack.us/img120/5952/maorulezwk5.gif
With the increases of life expectancy, decrease of average death rates, the numbers probably skew in Communist China's favor towards saving more people than it killed.
Er, that's not an example of free markets, that's more mercantilism than anything (a state providing access to resources in exchange for political concessions - mercantilism =/= capitalism).Capitalism is built on death and exploitation sorry. If you call increases in life expectancy and literacy 'failing', while at the same time calling The Scramble for Africa and China blocking aid to Darfur because PetroChina has a nice oil deal with the Sudanese 'wroking' ... then okay. No socialist society has been as much as it could be so far in our history(perhaps a bit because Capitalist nations try to destroy them because they want to go back to exploiting their natural resources) but they have caused much less death and destruction than Capitalism has. If you think Capitalism works because living standards for some classes in the home country improves, you are not looking at the whole picture.
Socialist economies in theory have zero economic mobility, as everyone is supposed to have an equal amount of wealth am i right lolyeah, you have to make your OWN money in capitalist countries! thats why economic mobility in them is so good am i right lol
Capitalism, admittedly, is not as simple as 'exploiting' money from poorer people, as many lesser socialists might argue. However, it is undeniable that a degree of imperialism is attached to capitalism. The U.S.A is a great example.(what with South and Central America, exploits in the Middle East, Southeast Asia,and I'm probably forgetting something)Whatever though, keep on believing that we can steal money from people and violate basic economic principles - when you actually have to make your own money, or at least understand the basic workings of making your own money, you might see things differently.