TCTphantom
formerly MX42
Yes obviously previous Ubers pokemon are kinda meh right now, but the power creep of this gen is also counterintuitive to dropping any Ubers. How does Darkrai help the metagame? Does it counter Gholdengo? Would this mean that Gholdengo is the real problem and Darkrai is only a way to not ban Gholdengo? It's stuff like this that one needs to consider when any Ubers pokemon is down in OU. It may be OU later, but unfortunately, we can't drop any Ubers to OU until DLC 2.
Honestly, this is the worst kind of anti unban argument, especially when a soft reset is on the table.The darkrai unban players still haven't seemed to grasp that the supposed positive qualities darkrai brings weavile brings to the table and more with actual ice stab and an equal speed tier this unban darkrai garbage is complete bull honestly every time the thread brings up unbanning an uber its complete bullshit. Stop talking about fucking darkrai and move on to the actual metagame for once
We do not ban things because they “don’t add anything” to the meta. We ban things because they are broken. If Darkrai is unbanned and ends up broken, that’s fine. If anything, it serves as a nice piece of data we can use in future tiering decisions. But wanting it not to drop just because it “doesn’t add anything” is misguided at best. Even with our small sample size of tour gameplay, there is evidence that Darkrai isn’t obviously broken beyond belief.
We know that the council is heavily weighing unbans in DLC2. Acting like there’s “no point’ in even letting Darkrai down is just being stubborn. Let’s say it does end up a problem. Darkrai takes time to show its true brokenness, and is banned sometime in June of 2024. Is that even a bad thing? We have data now that suggests Darkrai, even in spite of its nerfs and the way the game has changed, would be problematic. If it comes back in Gen X, that is useful to have on hand. It also comes across as disingenuous to just put Darkrai under more scrutiny than mons like Roaring Moon or Volcarona. Both of those seem to be consensus drops, even if people widely complained about them in the tier before they were banned. Darkrai imo is in the same ball park as them, and should be evaluated similarly on its ban worthy traits rather than some arbitrary definition of “adding to the tier”.
I’d also point out that there are benefits to Darkrai being unbanned. It serves as a special breaker and a form of speed control, which are appealing qualities. The only other strong special form of speed control we have rn is Dragapult. It’s also worth taking a look at because it’s clear there is public interest in it. This isn’t some fringe, one off poster saying that we should drop Giratina or something: it’s a repeated discussion that has legs. We know the OU council has at least floated the idea of dropping Darkrai in dlc2. Finch said that he was considering in in Office Hours and it was on a tiering survey. If there is this much public discussion of Darkrai in Ou and we have high level gameplay (even with the flaws of a tiny sample size and the short timeframe it was on the table) that suggests it isn’t a problem, I’d say that “has merit” for a drop.
Whether Darkrai should or should not drop should be based on its power level and whether it’s broken: not what it does or doesn’t add to the tier. Banning things on a subjective basis like that just isn’t how bans are handled. I’ll be happy if Darkrai comes down to Ou and is quickbanned in a month. I’ll be happy if it comes down to OU and stays. But if it stays or goes, it should be on its own qualities, not whether it “adds to the tier”.