An imaginary facet of the game in which field goals and free throws mystically become worth more in the last few minutes of a ball game.What's clutch?
You're vague.. What you just said made him the best clutch.What lol? People saying something has never at any point in history made it so. It is not about statistics, it is about obvious reality. Kobe fails in clutch time, just because he refuses to let someone else have the chance to be the failure does not make him anything positive.
I never said Kobe didn't have some poor performances, I said he doesn't let his missed shots affect his game like Lebron.Nothing in the world is black and white. You give me examples of poor performances (everyone has those)
Lucky shot, still lost the series.I can give you examples of great ones. Game winner at the buzzer against the Magic.
2007, he's changed. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BU2N0q6iSHk27 straight points against to Detroit.
Your defensive game isn't affected by pressure and the Bulls had no chance to win the series anyway.The last 6 minutes of each 4th quarter against the Bulls defensively, putting a stop to Rose.
3rd quarter.As far as the "throwing up a bunch of threes" goes, have you ever watched LeBron take over a game? Have you noticed that he gets in a zone with his jumpshot? If you need a specific (albeit, extreme) example here ya go
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tyd4NPvzKQg
um, you're going to a one-game reference..based on your arguments, clutch does not really exist. Clutchness is more of a generality like we have been arguing here. No "what ifs". Like it's already known that post-Cavalier LeBron chokes. and Kobe's been clutch for SOME eyes ("guts??" vs statistics).Quick side note... You cannot be a good man-to-man defender if you are "physically limited". Bruce Bowen had amazing lateral quickness and very quick hands that would contest every shot pretty much... Nash plays point guard, a position that doesn't require supreme athleticism to be effective on offense. Points need to be quick and preferably long to pass around or over the defense (and many others), but they don't need to jump 37+ inches off the ground or REQUIRE a long wingspan. Nash just does SO many things well that allow him to do what a point guard should do: run the offense.
Anyways...
Look man, if a player has the ball with ten seconds left on the clock and he goes into the lane, then he is going to be doubled. Someone is going to be open. If players (and mind you, often the best player on a team gets the potential game-winning shot) shoot on average 30% during these situations, isn't it better to pass to the open teammate? No player is going to make the game-winning basket even half the time or even two times out of five when closely guarded. It doesn't matter how good Lebron is... Not even Jordan could say that his team would win most of the time being down 1 or 2 with one possession left. The clutch factor isn't really a factor... What are factors are: 1) Did the refs swallow their whistles, 2) Can the player create adequate space, 3) Out of bounds or from the baseline, 4) Are any plays drawn up, and 5) Is the player confident enough to take the shot, and many more...
Oh wait... Aren't these factors during the regular game as well? Clutchness is not a real thing. If someone seems clutch, it is probably because he is good during the regular game as well...
I still dont think you realize why Kobe takes the shot the majority of the time... It doesnt matter what the stats say, when the games on the line you give the ball to who is by far your best player. Its a fact that nobody else on the Lakers can draw the double or break down the D better than Kobe can. Its the same reason the Celtics let Paul Pierce, literally every time take that stupid mid range pull up from the top of the key when the games on the line. At the end of the day this has literally become the silliest argument on any NBA blog. It just gives people like you a reason to try and slight a person who still won 5 rings, even though its arguing a stat that doesnt actually existWhat lol? People saying something has never at any point in history made it so. It is not about statistics, it is about obvious reality. Kobe fails in clutch time, just because he refuses to let someone else have the chance to be the failure does not make him anything positive.
Breaking down the defense and drawing double/triple teams is not an advantage if you also shoot through the double/triple team every time...Its a fact that nobody else on the Lakers can draw the double or break down the D better than Kobe can.
If only LeBron do this, Miami will be ubered. j/kI still dont think you realize why Kobe takes the shot the majority of the time...
nah, this fact overrules yours: in 5 4th quarters in last year's finals (around 120 minutes), LeBron scored only 11 points which is nowhere near your 50 points in 40 minutes (which is true but he's racking it up in regular season). You can't say it's just 5 games, 'coz it's the Finals! where real heroes and chokers show up.I can't believe anyone would think that Lebron generally becomes more passive in the 4th, considering he's averaging almost 50 points per 40 minutes of clutch play... but actual facts aren't going to change some minds.