You actually outlined your reasoning for voting for me, which they said they read, and then voted me. (wait a post)what makes it agreeing with me? they hopped on the vote without any explanation beyond a vague "I like this". it was a bandwagon vote yes
I am more using Big Mafia as a standard than Cool Weapon, since this is G3 with Laurel. In Big Mafia they were crazy inactive and hindered town with their inactivity (idling their role). So on the scale, they feel more Cool than Big.that's interesting cause I think laurel has been substantially less active
it's been stated to be a factor. what I remember hearing last game is that laurel never rolls scum and doesnt enjoy playing town so hes low presence but would be more active as scum (which he was) but theres no saying he wouldnt try and lean into the low wim town perception if he rolled scum again especially seeing as he got caught early last gameIs laurel's activity level at all related to if they're scum?
my point is what makes this the truthYou actually outlined your reasoning for voting for me, which they said they read, and then voted me. (wait a post)
??????????Idk, psy was making sense to me before they started rambling
ig posting a lot is better than none at all tho
It doesn’t, I just don’t think flat calling it a bandwagon as if it is 100% is right.my point is what makes this the truth
Like what I thought about LS commenting on their own posting style?okay so for ls then vizh can you tell me what you thought about what they said about their posts being awkward
yesLike what I thought about LS commenting on their own posting style?
The issue is that if the reasoning is the same, then it can still not be a bandwagon. It doesn’t have to be a bandwagon if the reasoning is the same automatically. (Not saying it isn’t in this case)see vizh if you were to vote m24 now it wouldnt be a bandwagon because you actually gave your own independent reason to scumread m24
okay yeah idk how laurel got here but I already called this out soYou think Vizh is scum then this game because he’s being more confident?
tbh that's fair, i think i kinda vibed with #425 with it being a larger more elaborate post, then read the rest of the single line posts as them rambling.??????????
Psy started off a lot more rambly and has gotten consistently less rambly lmao.
> M24 (somewhat) bandwagons and townreads Psy.
> Psy calls them out on it.
> M24: “Psy is rambly”
well it's still a bandwagon. in that case though it just could be town bandwagoningThe issue is that if the reasoning is the same, then it can still not be a bandwagon. It doesn’t have to be a bandwagon if the reasoning is the same automatically. (Not saying it isn’t in this case)
this is sorta how i felt igBut Psy is actually just extending the same thought over 3 posts
I'm starting to become tired of you. is your scumplan to kill my motivation to play?I'm NGL ik that double / triple / quadruple / quintuple posting is like how you play mafia because it more obviously organises separate thoughts than paragraphing, especially early on
But Psy is actually just extending the same thought over 3 posts and I feel like it's just to shore up the optics of his "I got us out of RVS and I am town core leader who is immune to being voted" narrative
schias vote on celever is really weird
lol what changedactually no I remember the circumstances. I dont wanna do that today though so Schiavetto where else would you wanna go today
btw is this a scumread? if it is, i wasn't picking up on it, just assumed it was an inconsistency pointout??????????
Psy started off a lot more rambly and has gotten consistently less rambly lmao.
> M24 (somewhat) bandwagons and townreads Psy.
> Psy calls them out on it.
> M24: “Psy is rambly”
I literally said. I remembered the circumstances behind the votelol what changed