KM
slayification
when i say compelling evidence, I mean experiential evidence, replays, calcs that show why a specific poke is better than another one. virtually every ru poke is usable in UU, but that doesn't mean it is or should be considered relevant to the tier. listing a laundry list of a ru pokemon's typing / moves / abilities isn't convincing at all; you have to operate under the assumption that we're somewhat experienced and already know that.
feel free to use stuff that isn't on the viability thread, and if you think it really is relevant to the meta you're more than welcome to post a list of replays, situations, and list of things it checks / counters in order to convince us. You saw this with limitless' use of granbull; a poke who was previously unused, yet when he showed along with a couple of other people that it was extremely good as a hydreigon and heracross check/counter for stall teams, we adjusted its placement in the viability thread drastically. the only difference between now and then is that unused stuff that isn't currently relevant to the meta will not be ranked at all.
feel free to use stuff that isn't on the viability thread, and if you think it really is relevant to the meta you're more than welcome to post a list of replays, situations, and list of things it checks / counters in order to convince us. You saw this with limitless' use of granbull; a poke who was previously unused, yet when he showed along with a couple of other people that it was extremely good as a hydreigon and heracross check/counter for stall teams, we adjusted its placement in the viability thread drastically. the only difference between now and then is that unused stuff that isn't currently relevant to the meta will not be ranked at all.